Whimbrels – a migration story

This article was submitted by Merry Roy, NCWAS board member

Whimbrels, one of the seven curlew species remaining in the world, fly from their wintering grounds in coastal South America, up to their Arctic breeding grounds.  On their way north the Atlantic flyway Whimbrels congregate for a month along the Carolina and Georgia coast, feeding on crabs in the tidal marshes, readying for the last leg of their journey.  They forage in the day and roost on a few sandbars at night, protected from predators.  The largest roosting area is Deveaux Bank at the mouth of a river in South Carolina.  One-half of the Atlantic flyway population of Whimbrels (one-quarter of all the Whimbrels in North America) roost on this sandbar.

This species has declined by 50% since 1994 and the decline continues.  While astounding numbers of Whimbrel roost on Deveaux Bank, a state bird sanctuary and Important Bird Area, there are few other nocturnal roosting sandbars for these birds.  Fall migration back to South America takes them along Hurricane Alley, creating other stresses.  Birds detour storms, often stopping to recover on islands in the Caribbean.  The French-controlled islands of Martinique and Guadalupe allow the hunting of shorebirds and even advertise “destination hunts”.

Protection of safe roosting sandbars, the proposed creation of new islands for nocturnal roosts, and the reduction of shorebird hunting are all positive actions to slow the Whimbrel population declines, but there is another threat. That’s us.  Researchers fear that birders and photographers traveling to view the amazing nocturnal numbers of Whimbrels on Deveaux will flush the birds.  And there are few other safe places for them to go in the middle of the night. 

For more information about Whimbrels, please see “A Miracle of Abundance: 20,000 Whimbrel take Refuge on a Tiny Island” by Scott Weidensaul, Cornell Lab.

A very compelling movie about Wimbrels on Deveaux Bank, South Carolina is avalilable on YouTube. Watch the movie (9:26).

Winter Raptor Survey – East Cascades Audubon Society requests help

The following email was forwarded to me with a request to post it here so people who may be available and interested to help will know of the need.  If this appeals to you please contact Jeff Fleischer directly.  Thanks.

Hi Everyone,

I wanted to inform interested folks about an opportunity to engage this winter in some meaningful citizen science survey work, mainly, to conduct raptor surveys for the East Cascades Audubon Society’s Winter Raptor Survey Project on routes throughout Washington and a small section of NE Oregon and western Idaho.  I am hoping that some of you will find this sort of effort interesting and want to get involved with the surveys this winter in your area 🙂

Specifically, here are the routes that are available (length in miles listed), they all have been surveyed in the past and I am hoping that we can continue collecting data on them :

LaCenter                              67 miles

Raymond – Holcomb            54

Winlock                                59

Castle Rock.                        53       

Moses Lake East                 60

Othello East                         73

Pullman SW                         64

Steptoe – Saint John.           82

LaCrosse                             74

Moscow North (ID)              87

Moscow South (ID)             59

Hermiston West (OR)         45

Pendleton (OR)                  98

Helix South (OR)                55

In addition, there are new routes available that have been created for our continuing expansion efforts in Washington.  They include:

Lakewood                            62

Sedro Woolley East             54

Sedro Woolley West            52

Sedro Woolley North           72

Coulee City                          83

Warden                                67

White Swan West                52

White Swan East                 73

Wapato                                67

Toppenish West                   79

Toppenish East                    54

Sunnyside North                  89

Sunnyside South                 43

Benton City NW                   69

Prosser North                      61

Prosser South                      92

Prosser West                       91

Grandview                           32

Tyler West                           79

For this project we ask our volunteers to commit to doing one survey each month for December, January and February.  Surveys can be conducted on a day of your choosing to fit with your own life schedule each month, hopefully you also have flexibility to conduct them when weather is not too crazy! :).  The months of November and March are also available but they are optional for this project, about 60% of all routes do get surveyed during November.   You should have confidence in your raptor ID skills, especially for Red-tailed Hawks, American Kestrels, Northern Harriers, Bald Eagles, and Rough-legged Hawks which combined account for around 92% of all birds counted in this project.  A pair of binoculars is a must to be able to see birds at a distance and if you happen to have a spotting scope those are very much encouraged. Some of these routes will necessitate  4WD or all wheel drive so that should be taken into consideration when you choose.  You should also bring a desire to thoroughly cover and search all available good raptor habitat, rushing through a survey just to get it done will invariably lead to missed birds.  

If this sounds like an activity that you would like to participate in this winter, you will be joining a group of 350 plus volunteers who last winter covered 452 routes covering more than 25,000 miles of transects each month throughout OR, ID, WA, and small parts of northern CA and UT and your assistance will be most welcome! :).  Please let me know which route you wish to take on (you might include a second and third choice if your first choice has been assigned), these will be filled on a first come first served basis.   I will provide you with the necessary information right away to get you prepared for what you will be doing.  It is a very active citizen science project that gives you an opportunity to engage with this wonderful family of birds and offering your help in helping us all to better understand their life histories :).  Hope to hear from some of you soon, thank you! 🙂

Jeff Fleischer
Project Coordinator
Winter Raptor Survey Project
East Cascades Audubon Society – Bend, OR  (project sponsor)

Methow Valley Bird Banding 2021 – End of Year Report

The 2021 MAPS banding season came to an abrupt end shortly after the July 15th banding session. Two wildfires in the area, Cedar Creek and Cub Creek 2, were growing in size and producing a lot of unhealthy smoke. Given the uncertainty of the situation, I made the difficult decision to cancel the last two banding sessions and dismantle the station. Thankfully the Cedar Creek Fire never reached the MAPS station. The firefighters have done an amazing job protecting structures and containing both fires. The map below shows the boundaries of the Cedar Creek and Cub Creek 2 fires in relation to the banding station as of August 11th.

Cedar Creek and Cub Creek 2 Fires, 11 August 2021. Map by Southwest Area Incident Management Team 2.

Most juvenile birds are captured during the last two MAPS sessions near the end of the breeding season. Identifying juveniles can be tricky, because many species look much different as juveniles than adults. Since we missed out on seeing a lot of juveniles this year, I thought I’d share a few pictures to illustrate some of the differences. (The juvenile descriptions are from Identification Guide to North American Birds, Part 1 by Peter Pyle https://www.birdpop.org/pages/moltAndPlumage.php.)

A juvenile Spotted Towhee has buffy-brown, streaked body plumage and a grayish-brown iris. The iris will gradually become red as the bird matures. Photos by Julie Hovis.
The Red-eyed Vireo is another species that has a grayish-brown iris as a juvenile. Photos by Julie Hovis.
Juvenile American Redstarts have brownish upperparts, grayish underparts, and two yellowish wing bars. Male American Redstarts do not obtain their distinctive black and orange plumage until they are two years old. Photos by Julie Hovis.
Juvenile Song Sparrows are drabber and buffier than adults with diffuse streaking on the face and underparts. They also have less distinctive facial and crown stripes and lack the rusty tones to the crown and back. Photos by Julie Hovis.

For reasons that are not easily explained, fewer birds were captured in 2021 than in previous years. At the end of the fifth (and final) banding session, we only had captured 61 birds. Even if the last two sessions had been conducted, it would have been almost impossible to reach the numbers captured in 2019 or 2020. Perhaps the low numbers are related to the die-off that happened in the southwestern U.S. last year during fall migration (https://www.audubon.org/news/study-starvation-and-freak-snow-storm-caused-southwests-mass-bird-die). It will be interesting to see how many birds find their way into the nets next season.

Methow Valley MAPS Banding Station Results, 2019-2021. Recaptured Previously Banded (R) includes same day recaptures, same year recaptures, and recaptures of birds banded in previous years. Unbanded (U) includes birds that escaped before they were banded and hummingbirds (which I am not authorized to band). Brown-headed Cowbird was the only new species captured in 2021.

Methow Valley Bird Banding Update – 12 July 2021

Beginner Bird Banding Class, June 2021. Photo by Jackie Hovis.

The 2021 Methow Valley banding season has been very busy.  It started in early June when I hosted a five-day beginner bird banding class.  The class was supported by NCWAS and taught by Danielle Kaschube.  Danielle works for the Institute for Bird Populations and coordinates their MAPS (Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship) banding program.  (You can learn more about the MAPS program by visiting the Institute for Bird Populations’ web site.)

Morning banding session. Photo by Julie Hovis

The class was fast-paced and covered a lot of material, which made for some very long days! Starting at sunrise the students spent several hours mist netting and banding captured birds. Skills taught during the morning banding sessions included the operation of mist nets and safe extraction of birds, bird-handling skills, and in-hand ageing and sexing techniques. In the afternoon they attended classroom lectures where the topics of banding ethics, the permitting process, and avian plumages and molt strategies were discussed. By all accounts the class was a success.  Everyone (including me!) learned a lot, and the students have been applying what they learned by volunteering at my MAPS station.

Learning to band and process birds. Photo by Julie Hovis.

To date, four of the seven required MAPS sessions have been completed and 54 birds representing 21 different species have been captured.  One of the goals of the MAPS program is to determine survival rates, so it is both exciting and informative when we recapture a bird that was banded in a previous year. So far this year we have recaptured five birds originally banded in 2019 (the year the station was started): one Warbling Vireo, two Swainson’s Thrush, one MacGillivray’s Warbler, and one Yellow Warbler.

Swainson’s Thrush photo by Jackie Hovis. All other photos by Julie Hovis.

All of these birds are Neotropical migrants. I can’t say exactly where they migrated to each winter, but range maps and e-Bird records show their nonbreeding ranges include Central America. Hypothetically speaking, if they migrated as far south as Costa Rica, these birds have made the one-way trip of ±3,600 miles between their winter and breeding grounds at least five times. That is beyond amazing!

June 2021 Big Count results

Below is a brief note that Joe Veverka sent to the leaders of the individual teams that participated in the 2021 Big Day Bird Count in our four-county area. Thanks for compiling all the data Joe.

Thanks for participating in the NCWAS Annual Big Count!  Despite incredible wind speeds we found a lot of birds.  I only birded until about 2pm vs my 10pm end time on the previous Big Count.  Attached is the complete species list of the count.  We identified and counted a total of 8972 birds of 172 species in our 4-County area and submitted a total of 127 complete checklists!  Okanogan Co. found 152 species captured with 52 checklists followed by Chelan Co. with 136 species and 53 checklists.  Douglas Co. was a distant 3rd counting 103 species and submitting 22 checklists.  Ferry Co……0 species and 0 checklists.  I predict in 2022 Ferry Co will win most improved! 

 

I hope you will join us again next year as we evolve and refine “The Big Count”!

Thanks! and Happy Birding!

Joe

You can see the composite species list by clicking here. Looks like a great day filled with a wonderful variety of birds.

5 Legislative Successes


2021 was a big year for state-level conservation and climate policy. Thanks to the support of Audubon Washington and Local Audubon Chapters across the state, the bills listed below are now law.

  • Clean Fuel Standard (HB 1091)
  • Cap and Invest program (SB 5126)
  • HEAL Act (SB 5141)
  • Updating Washington’s shoreline armoring policy (SB 5273)
  • Funding for post-fire sagebrush recovery, smart solar siting in the Columbia Plateau, and a near record-setting state conservation budget 

How did we do it in a pandemic while everyone is working from home? Audubon’s statewide network wrote to key legislators, signed and shared Action Alerts, and met with legislators to support these policies.    While seeing the above bills enacted into law was a huge lift that Audubon members can and should be proud of, we must continue our work to advance the ball for the environment.  Bottom line, what’s good for the environment is good for birds.  So our work is not done, in fact we never will be, and NCWAS will remain involved.

submitted by Mark Johnston 060121

Building the nest

Anna’s Hummingbirds over-winter in the Wenatchee valley. Can you imagine the hardiness of a bird that weighs just 3-6 grams (0.1-0.2 oz.) that needs to contend with temperatures in the teens and 45 miles per hour winds? They are determined to survive until spring so they can begin to build a nest to raise their young.

Female Anna’s pick the nesting spot and build their tiny nest (1 inch tall and 1.5 inches in diameter). Over the period of a week, she gathers plant down from a variety of plants and weaves in spider webs for strength and stability. The bird brings in the material and positions it with its beak and then packs the material with its feet and forms the nest around herself with a series of vibrating movements. Quick sweeps of a wing keep the outside of the nest solid and shaped.

Friends alerted me to this nest in their yard and gave me access. This short video will be the first of several as I document this nest and, with fervent hope, the hatching of young.

The video is hosted on the NCWAS YouTube channel here. You can watch the video in 4K or HD with a simple selection in the Settings. I highly recommend at least 1080.

Enjoy the show!

Siskin/Salmonella Experiment

This article is provided by Bill Kampen, Leavenworth, WA. It is a longer article than our usual blog posts.

We are all concerned about the spread of disease in our wild birds. Bill took it on himself to not only respond to the need to exercise caution while feeding, but also to use the situation to learn. He kept a detailed record about which feeder types he was using, what type of food, and the bird’s that visited. We can all learn from Bill’s documentation. Thanks, Bill.

Two months ago (mid-December) large flocks of pine siskins began appearing in our yard.  We thought at the time that this was great, and responded by adding extra finch feeders to accommodate them—a big mistake in hindsight.  Within a couple weeks we started finding dead siskins, but at first rationalized this away (window strikes, natural causes).  But when It kept getting worse, we realized something was seriously wrong, so we closed down our birdbath for the winter and removed our seed feeders until we could figure out what was going on.  

We must have been among the first to deal with this here, because since that time there have been numerous articles appearing in newspapers from California to British Columbia warning people about the siskin irruption and accompanying salmonella outbreak. These articles have generally been very informative and helpful, but not always consistent, still leaving many questions unanswered.  So we decided to rehang a couple of our seed feeders, and monitor and adjust as needed.

Our efforts over the next month appeared to be successful, so last Monday (Feb 15), I decided to run an experiment.  I began with our current baseline feeder set-up which was now doing a nice job supporting the usual wintering birds, while not attracting huge flocks of siskins, which I believed to have been the cause of the earlier salmonella outbreak.  Over the next several days, by making a few subtle changes (number of feeders, feeder types, seeds being offered), I hoped to get a clearer picture of what worked, what didn’t, and why.  

In the initial baseline set-up, there were only three seed feeders:  A 1/4” mesh cylinder feeder (like a magnum feeder, but smaller) filled with black oil sunflower seeds (BOSS) hanging from our maple tree;  a 1’ square tray feeder with a mesh bottom hung below a squirrel guard five feet away; and a no-mess seed cylinder hanging from our birch about 50 feet away.  Four suet feeders were also present, and would remain throughout the experiment, but play no role.  The daily log below tracks this experiment in real time.

DAY 1 (Monday, Feb. 15)

Tray feeder filled with BOSS as usual.  Number of siskins observed: 0.  Goldfinches: 1  Lots of activity on all feeders, but mostly centered on tray feeder, since seeds are most accessible here.  House finches are numerous—maybe 20 in the flock, hanging around all day.  White-headed woodpecker, flicker, and downy woodpecker come in regularly to suet feeders.  Lots of b-c chickadees and r-b nuthatches as usual.  Up to 3 song sparrows still present.  2 pygmy nuthatches and 1 mountain chickadee also seen, the latter seen multiple times.  No “frantic activity” anywhere—the birds know what they can expect to find here, and even at the tray feeder they generally just “grab and go” without much fuss.  Stellar’s jay numbers have increased since I added the tray feeder—high count today was 10.  They visit all feeders, and the other birds back off when they are present.  All in all, nice balance and fun to watch.  No problems.

DAY 2

Light snowfall.  Lots of birds coming in early (7:30-8:00).  Mountain chickadee still here.  I refilled the tray feeder at 9:30, again with straight BOSS.  2 goldfinches showed up, along with lots of house finches (20 or so, like yesterday).  Even with the adjacent high-bush cranberry hedge and tray feeder now full of activity, the pace is still calm enough that our white-headed woodpecker felt comfortable coming in to feed on the suet feeder just two feet away.  The 2 goldfinches did not feed—just briefly checked out the tray from their perch in the hedge, and left.  Were they hoping for sunflower chips?  

When I checked the feeders again at noon, there was a healthy-looking siskin sitting in the center of the tray feeder, determined to defend it against all comers.  The house finch flock was in, so after a few seconds of dashing from side to side trying to drive them all off, the siskin gave up and retreated to the hedge.  It then flew to the mesh cylinder (BOSS) feeder and circled it once on foot, before flying off without taking a BOSS from either place.  Was it checking for sunflower chips like the goldfinches earlier?  

It’s 12:12 now and the siskin is back on the tray; behavior as before.  Very aggressive—wings and tail flared, rushing at birds that are attempting to join it on the tray.  This time it appears to be feeding, but unlike the other birds that grab and go, it apparently does not want to relinquish its spot at the feeder, or share with non-siskins.  It left after a couple minutes.
 
When I checked again at 2:20, the birds were distributed among the other feeders, so I figured the tray feeder was probably empty.  It was, so I cleaned it and refilled it with BOSS for the late afternoon crowd, if there was one. The house finches and a few juncos were all over it right way, up to 8-10 at a time.  The house finch flock has now grown to about 30.  The tray feeder is VERY busy now—lots of comings and goings—but still almost no disputes or aggression.  No siskins or goldfinches are present.

It is now 3:12 and activity has slowed.  The 3-5 house finches that occupy the tray feeder now tend to just stay and eat rather than grab and go.  Occasionally a new one comes in to replace one that leaves.  Most are males, and occasionally a junco or b-c chickadee will join them.  It is very peaceful—everyone seems to get along, and all are willing to share the space.

It is now 3:18, and the finches have all left.  A song sparrow now sits in the middle of the tray feeder, having it all to himself.  A few b-c chickadees are still working the suet feeders, and lots of juncos in the hedge, but they are not coming up to join the song sparrow on the tray.  Is it almost empty?  I’ll check in a few minutes.  

It is now 5:00.  The juncos left around 3:30, and the chickadees and song sparrows (2) stayed a little later.  At 5:00 I refilled the mesh BOSS feeder for tomorrow (about half eaten over two days).  The tray feeder still had a few BOSS, so the finches and juncos did not leave because the feeder was empty—they had just had enough.  NOTE: This time I made a change, refilling the tray with a seed blend containing sunflower chips, instead of straight BOSS.  So the real test begins tomorrow, and we’ll see if this makes a difference.


DAY 3

(Note:  I do Project FeederWatch every Wed-Thurs, so that starts today.)  A flock of 10 siskins arrived at 8:30, focusing on the tray feeder, and specifically the chips.  Seven of them are able to feed harmoniously on the tray at one time, but they like being IN the tray rather than perched on the edge of it, as most of the larger grab-&-go birds do.  When a new siskin wants to come in, a departing siskin will make room for it—usually not much fuss.  Non-siskins are NOT tolerated.  If a jay appears, the siskins depart quickly.  With the arrival of the siskin flock, then, the house finches have dropped one rung in the pecking order, so there is a longer wait for them to gain a seat at the table.  If only one or two siskins are on the tray, the juncos, house finches, and chickadees are welcome to join them.  All-in-all, not much disruption so far.  However, 7 siskins FEEDING IN the tray means the potential for 7 siskins defecating ONTO the chips, which have no protective shell.  When I was feeding straight BOSS, this was not an issue.

By 9:40 siskin numbers had increased to 16, so I added a 6-port tube feeder with the same seed mix as on the tray to accommodate them.  This is an EcoClean feeder with a weather dome and EcoClean seed tray, so should be easy to keep clean.

It is now 3:16, and a fluffed-up siskin is sitting on the lowest perch of the tube feeder, and hopping around on the attached seed-catcher.  There have been no problems up until this siskin appeared.  It just left (3:21), so if I hadn’t checked the feeders five minutes ago, I’d have missed it.  Was this siskin infected with salmonella?  Impossible to tell, of course.  If salmonella is only spread through feces, we should be fine.  If it’s also spread through saliva, maybe not.  I continue to believe that this flock would be better off foraging in the trees (native seeds), but probably worse off if it returns to wherever this one picked up the infection (if it was, in fact, infected).  So if I stop feeding the chips, there is no way to know if this will help or hurt the flock—a dilemma. 

Tonight I found this advice from the Canadian Wildlife Health Cooperative:  Avoid using tube feeders that require birds to stick their head inside openings to feed as infected birds may leave discharge containing Salmonella bacteria on the sides of these openings, which could easily be transferred to healthy individuals and cause them to become sick with salmonellosis. 

DAY 4

Tray refilled with mixed seed, so same set-up as yesterday, but with tube feeder removed following above advice.  First in this morning at 7:30 were the siskins—counted 18.  They crowded onto the tray feeder—up to a dozen at once.  They left after about 6 minutes and were replaced by 7 jays (probably why they left).  14 juncos were in the hedge, but mostly stayed there, with a couple venturing onto the feeder after the jays left.  House finches have not appeared yet.

At 7:50 a much larger flock of siskins appeared at the top of the 60-foot maple tree from which the feeders hang, and these siskins began working their way downward toward the feeder.  I counted at least 50—easy to count—bare tree limbs and birds silhouetted against the sky.  When I swiveled my chair around to write this on my laptop, I heard a bird hit the window, and when I looked back the flock was gone, so I suspect our Cooper’s or sharpie came through.  It’s now 8:04, and 4 siskins are back on the tray, with a few more in the hedge, but I don’t see the larger flock.  Still no house finches this morning, and, except for one chickadee and one nuthatch, not a single bird has shown any interest whatsoever in the almost-full mesh BOSS feeder just 5 feet away.

8:45—the siskin flock is back and probably closer to 60.  They’re starting to overwhelm the tray feeder, so I added one EcoClean finch feeder with weather dome and seed-catcher and filled with finch blend, just to see if I could disperse the birds somewhat, and also to see if there was any difference as to which seed blend they preferred.  

It is now 9:20, and siskins are all over both feeders, with house finches waiting in the hedge, as usual.  Also, with so many birds concentrated here, a secondary feeding area below has quickly developed—something that did not occur when I was feeding straight BOSS.  Lots of birds are dropping down here to feed, including siskins, which tend to forage in tight groups.  Meanwhile, the mesh BOSS feeder and winter-blend seed cylinder remain ignored by the siskins—their full attention is absorbed by the finch and tray feeders, and the ground below.

9:30—I’m looking at a feeding FRENZY now—I think it was the finch feeder that tipped the scales.  Both feeders and the ground below are now covered with siskins–a salmonella outbreak waiting to happen–so rather than wait for the first sick siskins to appear, I am pulling the plug now.  

9:40-9:45:  When I went out to retrieve the feeders, not all the siskins left.  I stood right under the finch feeder with my hand resting on the hanging tray, and siskins kept coming in.  I had 5 on the tray (all appearing healthy), while my hand rested there.  Two months ago I would have found this experience to be quite magical.  Now it seemed just strange and scary.  I removed both feeders, cleaned the tray and added 1 cup of BOSS.  I did not rehang the finch feeder.  When I approached the feeding area, I could see the siskins watching from the tops of the maple, birch, and tamarack.   I rehung the tray, and went inside to see what would happen.  

9:50:  The “changing of the guard” took only 5 minutes, and was fascinating to watch.  The house finches, chickadees, and jays seemed to realize immediately that we were back to normal (BOSS only), and they all started coming in as they had before the change in seed took place.  Probably coincidentally, both our flicker and white-headed woodpecker showed up right away, too.  A few siskins landed on the tray feeder and poked around a bit, but when they saw that only BOSS was on offer, they left the feeder to the house finches, which were arriving in numbers.  A jay came and went.  At 9:50, the entire siskin flock, which had been still observing all this from the treetops, flew off en-mass. 

10:25:  House finches now dominating—I count about 2 dozen.  About half the siskin flock just returned, and are mobbing everything.  They feed frantically under the tray (where there are still plenty of spilled chips); then fly up to the hedge; then to the tray where they push the BOSS around searching for chips that are no longer there; then over to the seed cylinder where there ARE chips, but they have to work to extract them; then up into the birch above the seed cylinder; then back to the hedge, and around again.  Occasionally one or two even check out the mesh BOSS feeder, which is where the house finches are going now that the siskins are crowding onto the tray and cylinder.

11:00:  The birds have pretty much finished off the chips on the ground, so while there are still a few siskins coming into the seed cylinder, most have now left.  Was this a second flock that came in after seeing the spilled seed, and then needed to check out the tray and cylinder?  Or was it part of the earlier flock back to make sure they were reading the situation correctly, and to finish off whatever nyjer and chips might be left?  No way to know, but I suspect the latter.  In any case, this was basically a repeat of an hour ago, but taking longer because of the spilled chips and nyjer.  With these pretty much gone now, this should be the end of it.  One fluffed-up siskin remains, sitting on the lower perch of the seed cylinder. 

11:35:  Only one siskin remains—hanging out near the seed cylinder.  Don’t know if it is the same one that appeared fluffed up earlier, but maybe.  Starting to snow.  Several birds feeding at the tray, including one goldfinch.  Hedge filled with a nice mix of birds, and one pine squirrel.  Good to have the large siskin flock gone.

1:00:  No activity at the tray, so I checked to see if it was empty, and it was.  I refilled it with two cups of BOSS and hung it back up.  About an inch of fresh snow has covered the few remaining spilled seeds and shells, so ground feeding is now confined to one or two juncos, or no birds at all.  The lack of visible seeds or shells against the white snow, and the lack of bird activity, means not much to draw in passing siskin flocks.  Mostly juncos here now (about 2 dozen), with 4 siskins also hanging around—hedge, tray, cylinder.  Pretty quiet out there, except for all the juncos.

1:20:  An adult Cooper’s hawk just came in, spent a minute or so perched near the hedge, and then flew off.  Juncos quickly resumed feeding after it left
.
4:00:  Birds gone, still snowing, normal feeding activity all afternoon.

DAY 5

I finished snow-blowing and shoveling by 7:45, and hung a second mesh BOSS feeder where the tube and finch feeders had briefly hung before.  This one is thinner with no seed-catcher, and has a weather dome, so it is about the same size and shape as the finch and tube feeders.  Siskins came in right away—likely were there before I started watching—but only a dozen or so.  Their behavior was interesting.  They continued to shun the mesh BOSS feeder that had been there the whole time, but were very interested in checking out the tray and new BOSS feeder, apparently still hoping to find nyjer and/or sunflower chips.  

I thought they’d leave when they found out there weren’t any, but instead they began actually eating the BOSS. This was fine with me—their behavior mimicked the house finches, and they seemed to just be gradually settling into the regular routine here.  Some also went to the cylinder where the chips WERE available, but where they had to work to extract them.  The siskins (and one goldfinch) all appeared healthy, so if this continues to be the case, maybe I can keep feeding the BOSS.  We’ll see.  A new bird for the winter, a male Cassin’s finch, also showed up (7:57; reported to eBird).

4:00:  The tray was empty, so I added a cup of BOSS, even though most birds should be done for the day.  There is little activity out there now.  Today overall was uneventful—all feeders very active, with still 10 siskins or so now apparently having joined the yard regulars.  I’ll keep an eye out for sick or dead birds, which would be most likely to appear either on or under the cylinder or tray feeder if they show up at all, and will make adjustments accordingly.

DAY 6

Siskins number around 20 today, with continuous use of the cylinder and tray mainly, but both mesh feeders, too.  With three BOSS feeders now up (2 mesh and 1 tray), no snow, and warmer temperatures melting the snow under the feeders and hedge, there is a noticeable accumulation of shells.  This would be highly visible to passing flocks, and may be contributing to the growing number of both siskins and house finches.  I’m a little uncomfortable with this, given the ever-present threat of salmonella, and wonder if I may now be pulling birds away from natural food sources which are safer for them. 

One fluffed-up siskin spent some time foraging on the ground below the feeders, along with the healthier birds—juncos, house finches, and other siskins.  It did not seem at all lethargic, though, which makes me wonder if some of the siskins get mildly sick and eventually recover.  This siskin seemed to have no trouble keeping up with the rest of the flock.  Am I getting hyper-sensitive?  I understand that the disease is almost always fatal—just wonder if some siskins can fight it off.  Also, should one puffed-up siskin be reason enough to take down all four seed feeders?

2:00:  No further signs of sick siskins, but in an abundance of caution I took down all but the original mesh feeder, which I re-hung under the squirrel guard where the tray feeder had been.  When I checked again an hour later, only a few siskins were present, with mostly house finches and a few chickadees using the feeder.  I’m liking this “less is more” concept—being able to dial up or down the feeding activity by simply increasing or reducing the number of feeders, changing the type of feeder, and/or changing the seed being offered.  Maybe I’m starting to get the hang of this.  If so, good news for the birds here.

DAY 7

At 7:35 a flock of about ten juncos arrived.  While they are able to perch on the seed-catcher attached to the mesh BOSS feeder, they generally prefer to forage on or under the hedge, or under the suet feeders on the south side of the house where patches of bare ground are beginning to appear.  chickadees and nuthatches are around, too.

8:25:  A dozen house finches are perched in the hedge, with two goldfinches.  All seem to be assessing the new one-feeder set-up.  The goldfinches left immediately, but the house finches just sit, perhaps waiting to see if the other feeders will reappear.  They are all used to me taking them down, refilling them, and hanging them back up, so… 

11:40:  Warmer, with a light rain.  The hedge and feeder have been pretty much empty since the now-reduced flock of house finches left.  Only a few juncos, and one pine squirrel, remain.  No chickadees, nuthatches, or woodpeckers either.  This is usually a quiet time anyway, so we’ll see if things pick up this afternoon.  This is the quietest the yard has been since I started the experiment a week ago, but that’s to be expected, with both the tray and cylinder feeders gone.  Whoops—spoke too soon—small flocks of house finches and chickadees are back (11:47).  No siskins, though.

1:55:  Still raining, and almost no activity near the feeder, though a few siskins and house finches remain in the hedge.  To see if I could generate a bit more activity, I moved the mesh feeder to its original spot and added the tray feeder filled with one cup of BOSS back under the squirrel guard.  We’re now back almost to baseline, but with the cylinder feeder still not there.  If the siskins don’t return in numbers by tomorrow, I’ll probably rehang that, too.

3:10:  No flocks, but a nice mix of individual birds coming in one at a time:  b-c chickadees, 1 mountain chickadees, 1 r-b nuthatch, 1 goldfinch, 1 siskin, and a few juncos, but no house finches.  The birds that have rediscovered the tray feeder clearly prefer it to the mesh cylinder, but the finch flocks have apparently found other places to feed, so we are off their radar, at least for now.  I suspect they will check us out again tomorrow morning, and finding the tray feeder back up, a few more will hang around.  Not enough seeds available here to pull in larger flocks, though, so hopefully we’re returning to balance now. 

This concludes the log, but of course feeding birds is really an endless experiment, so that will continue indefinitely.  Always new problems to solve, and new things to learn—part of the fun.

*******   
Tentative conclusions:  If we offer nyjer and/or sunflower chips, large flocks of siskins will come in and pretty much wreck havoc, ignoring not only the BOSS we’ve put out for them, but native seeds (still plentiful around here) as well.  If we keep supplying them with nyjer/chips, salmonella will soon begin spreading through the flock, killing siskins and needlessly putting our other feeder birds at risk.  We’ve already fully experienced this once, and I’ve tested this theory twice now (documented the second time) and don’t plan to go through it again! 

If we STOP feeding nyjer, chips, and BOSS, pretty much all the finches will disperse, hopefully returning to their natural buffet in the surrounding trees.  But we CAN still safely continue to scatter cracked corn for the quail, juncos, jays, and other ground- feeders, and our suet feeders can stay up for the woodpeckers, nuthatches, chickadees, and song sparrows.  So no need to stop feeding entirely.  

There may be a middle ground.  ALL of the birds in our yard like BOSS, so once the finches have left, one mesh BOSS feeder, one BOSS tray feeder, and MAYBE the seed cylinder can be re-hung, without causing the siskins to return in force—just too small an offering, and almost none of their favorite food, so as long as we can safely offer it, we will.  Individual or small flocks of healthy finches that happen by are always welcome, too, of course.
 
I’m really liking the little hanging tray feeder, and have a round, all-mesh one on order.  When placed under a squirrel guard/weather dome, these little trays stay surprisingly clean, with the dome also catching any droppings from birds perched above.  And, since the tray needs to be refilled every day or two, it can easily be cleaned frequently, too.  The new one I’ve ordered, being round, will be even better protected by the squirrel baffle (no corners sticking out to catch snow, rain, or droppings), and also should be easier to clean (no corners or edges).  Best of all, there are no ports into which all birds must repeatedly stick their heads or bills.  Since it is non-selective, we may have to take it down from time to time if a flock of starlings or house sparrows finds it, but that hasn’t been an issue here for a long time. 

With the siskins still in the area, rehanging the tube or finch feeders, or resuming use of seed mixes containing sunflower chips, is off the table, at least for now, and I am wondering about the wisdom of doing this even after they leave.  I think loose sunflower chips are just too attractive to siskins, and to finches generally– so much so that these birds will abandon native foods to seek it out.  Knowing what we now know about the susceptibility of siskins and other finches  to salmonella,  conjunctivitis, etc., and the danger of pulling them away from their natural food sources to our feeders where close-contact encourages infections to spread, I’m wondering if we should continue to do this.  Is it a coincidence that the 80% decline in siskin numbers over the last 40 years mirrors the explosive increase in the use of these pre-shelled seeds in feeders?  At the very least, I think we have to be very careful when using these seeds. 

That’s it for now.  As always, feedback is much appreciated. 
Bill

Shrub-steppe song bird survey

Material provided by Richard Scranton

For five years, North Central Washington Audubon Society participated in breeding bird surveys in our region’s shrub-steppe habitat. This was a collaborative community-based science effort with other eastern Washington chapters, Audubon Washington and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife to identify songbird distribution within the remaining shrub-steppe in our state. It generated over 20,000 bird observations from 130 volunteers and represents an unprecedented volunteer undertaking in support of shrub-steppe birds and their habitat.

Now that the surveys have ended, what will happen with all that data? Representatives from Audubon Washington and several eastern Washington chapters have formed a committee that will work to put it to good use. The group’s mission statement is to ‘Promote Restoration and Conservation of Shrub-steppe Habitat in Washington State.’

Survey data has identified the highest quality shrub-steppe habitats in the state. The goal of this committee is to promote methods to keep these habitats sustainable. Shrub-steppe has long been the most threatened habitat in Washington with only a small fraction of its historical acreage remaining. There are many factors that could make the situation worse. One example is the devastating fires in Okanogan and Douglas Counties last September.

Updates will be posted to our website. If you would like to get involved or have questions, contact Richard Scranton at rscran4350@yahoo.com.

Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and Conservation Northwest partnered to make a beautiful film about our region’s shrub-steppe habitat. You can see it at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfhM9vLQD-0&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR3Yc4u6_rDeEWjVZjWGGNab_OJgY3xLbbN8O6JzFLLEvb1xrPo-RHkZzgk

NOTE: there is a second link to this film in the Resources section of the NCWAS website.